tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6611875170009784219.post7725093152103126909..comments2024-03-28T22:41:33.502-04:00Comments on Noblemania: Now this is my kind of Super Bowl storyMarc Tyler Noblemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10732005290440645718noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6611875170009784219.post-2287366317252300582011-02-06T18:39:17.647-05:002011-02-06T18:39:17.647-05:00Thanks for commenting, Delmo. That was an oversigh...Thanks for commenting, Delmo. That was an oversight that I've now fixed; you probably noticed I did originally include the "co" in the previous paragraph.<br /><br />However, as I know you know, Kane's credit is contractual, not actual. I do feel that if either man is entitled to a sole "creator" credit, it'd be Finger. The most Kane contributed to the mythos is the name, and even that is disputed; Finger also gives Kane credit for Two-Face. <br /><br />Finger, meanwhile, unquestionably crafted the iconic look, the atmospheric tone, and the groundbreaking origin.<br /><br />Still, I'd settle for crediting both men.<br /><br />Finger first. :)Marc Tyler Noblemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10732005290440645718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6611875170009784219.post-66994071690547262322011-02-06T13:38:16.000-05:002011-02-06T13:38:16.000-05:00I saw that documentary-fascinating.
Shouldn'...I saw that documentary-fascinating. <br /><br />Shouldn't the line "He created a character known worldwide..." read "He co-created..."? I know you and many others want Mr.Finger to get a richly deserved co-creator credit for Batman but, let's not suddenly throw out Bob Kane.Delmohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10156851971491531444noreply@blogger.com