Showing posts with label Entertainment Weekly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entertainment Weekly. Show all posts

Monday, June 24, 2019

School visit testimonials, word bubble style

Some magazines round up what they consider the best quotations of the previous week and display them within word bubbles; exhibit 1: Entertainment Weekly (which, effective after this weeks issue, is going monthly):


This inspired me to present some school visit testimonials in a similar fashion (sans heads):

Monday, May 23, 2016

"Entertainment Weekly" RIP covers

Between the 1989 launch of Entertainment Weekly and its 2019 switch to a monthly, the magazine ran only 19 "in memoriam" covers. Stats: 

  • 15 men, 4 women
  • 9 singers, 7 actors, 3 comedians
  • 15 white people, 4 Black
  • 11 black and white images, 8 color
  • year with most covers (four): 2016

The covers:

 Kurt Cobain, 1994

 Chris Farley, 1997

Frank Sinatra, 1998

George Harrison, 2001

Katharine Hepburn, 2003

Marlon Brando, 2004

Johnny Carson, 2005

Heath Ledger, 2008

Paul Newman, 2008

Michael Jackson, 2009 **

Patrick Swayze, 2009

Whitney Houston, 2012

Philip Seymour Hoffman, 2014

Robin Williams, 2014

David Bowie, 2016

Prince, 2016

George Michael, 2016

  Carrie Fisher, 2016

Aretha Franklin, 2018

** EW produced four covers for Michael Jackson's death; the other three:




I did not count covers about deceased notables that were not tributes published the week after their deaths:


Standalone tribute magazines (surely an incomplete list as these are harder to track):

Jerry Garcia 1995

Leonard Nimoy, 2015

Stan Lee 2018

Luke Perry 2019

Chadwick Boseman 2020

Am I missing any?


2/9/22 addendum: It was announced today that Entertainment Weekly is ceasing print publication; the last issue will be April 2022. I have been a subscriber since its second year, 1990. Looks like I have to add the magazine itself to this RIP post...

Saturday, June 19, 2010

You can judge a cover by its book

I first subscribed to Entertainment Weekly soon after its 1990 launch and have subscribed continuously since.

In those twenty years, the magazine has covered books fairly well, but has showed authors on the cover rarely. (They have run dozens if not hundreds of cover stories about movies based on books, but those show actors, not authors.)

I can recall only three cover stories with the author him- or herself in the spotlight (from 1994, 2002, and 2007, respectively):

 

Related, from earlier in 2007:

 

The current issue is, I believe, the second time the cover has depicted not an author but a book itself:

 
I realize this is a milestone only in my narrow little pop culture realm, but it's still a nice thumb's-up for the publishing industry.

3/30/12 addendum:


In this 4/6/12 issue, editor Jess Cagle writes "Why aren't there more book-themed covers on EW? The answer is obvious: If you've got an overall audience of nearly 18 million (including our magazine and website), movies and television are the fastest way to the greatest number of hearts."

(Turns out this Fifty Shades of Grey cover was for subscribers only; the cover of the newsstand edition of the same issue featured The Hunger Games...film.)

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Save the magazines

Here is a clever public service announcement that appears in the 4/16/10 issue of Entertainment Weekly:

It makes a compelling argument.

Most gutsy thing about it

It's laid out "old school magazine" style—just blocks of text with virtually no design. No callout boxes, no art, barely any color. This sends a message that magazines don't have to look like websites to survive.

Most troubling thing about it

Aren't the people who need to read it not going to see it because they're not reading magazines anymore?

And is it supporting or undermining the cause to post it online?